I don't know enough about the micro/tracking stats to have a particularly strong opinion, but my vibe on them is that they're a lot of noisy stuff that gets baked into the macro shot volume/quality metrics already. For example, being obsessed with the specific size of the gap a defender gives in transition if it doesn't actually lead to a meaningful reduction in shot chances strikes me as a bias confirmation exercise, but with spreadsheets because I'm a progressive hockey data person. There's a reason there's a schism in the data community, a lot of the tracking stats are just people assuming traditionalist knowledge on the sport is valid and then trying to justify it through data. It would be like if Billy Beane got obsessed with how many pitches a batter was fouling off because something something putting pressure on the pitcher rather than OBP, which has a direct correlation with runs, which has a direct correlation with wins.